Scaling and readiness of underlayers for high-numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet lithography

Abstract

With the introduction of high-numerical aperture (NA) extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, the thickness of layers in the lithographic stack will scale owing to reduced depth of focus and etch budget. The consequence of thinning down underlayers for EUV lithography has been scarcely investigated. In here, we assessed the readiness of nine state-of-the-art underlayers, spin-on and dry deposited, in thickness series down to 4 nm nominal. Preliminarily, the coating quality of these underlayers was evaluated. Thickness uniformity across 300 mm wafer ranged from about & PLUSMN;0.5 nm to < & PLUSMN; 0.05 nm depending on the coating technique employed. Surface roughness of the underlayers varied from as much as 0.63 nm to as low as 0.062 nm but was not impacted by thickness scaling. Film density and total surface energy varied by < 10 % with thickness. EUV lithography of dense lines/spaces arrays of pitch 28 nm was carried out using a positive tone chemically amplified photoresist. Dose-to-size and exposure latitude changed by < & PLUSMN; 5 % when thickness of underlayer was decreased. Failure free process was at most 1 nm smaller for thinner underlayer than it was for the thinnest version of each type. The unbiased linewidth roughness increased consistently but limitedly (< 5 % ) when thinner underlayers were used, mainly due to a reduction in the correlation length. By calculating the power spectral density of the blanket underlayer we can pinpoint this effect to a reduction of correlation length of the underlayer own surface roughness. Finally, Z-factor calculations demonstrated that overall photoresist performance depended more significantly on the specific underlayer type (& PLUSMN;12.6 % ) than it did on underlayer thickness (& PLUSMN;8 % ). All these results indicate that most of underlayers investigated had limited impact on the properties as well as the patterning performance when scaling in view of high NA EUV. (c) 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)