An experimental study on the perceived quality of natively graded versus inverse tone mapped high dynamic range video content on television

Abstract

High Dynamic Range (HDR) television promises to display higher brightness and deeper black levels and thus more vivid and realistic images. However, home video distribution and video broadcasting were historically designed for what we now call standard dynamic range screens (SDR). In order to display SDR content on an HDR screen, it is explicitly or implicitly converted, in a process called inverse tone mapping (iTMO). This paper's goal is to assess the perceived quality of converted SDR content in comparison to natively graded HDR content. In doing so, this paper aims to enable content creators/distributors to make informed choices between creating/broadcasting HDR content or relying on conversion. To this end, a psychophysical experiment was performed to tests how viewers evaluate the difference between natively graded HDR and a set of SDR to HDR conversion options in a television setup. Results indicate that viewers prefer natively graded HDR content, followed by inverse tone mapping algorithms starting from videos with a compressed dynamic range. When comparing conversion options, users clearly prefer conversion from 'compressed dynamic range' SDR over 'clipped dynamic range' SDR. Users disliked videos that were naively stretched from standard SDR. In addition, a significant effect of type of sequence was found, with a preference for light scenes with low contrast.