3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE versus standard 2D TSE for routine knee MRI: a large-scale interchangeability study

Abstract

Objective To perform a large-scale interchangeability study comparing 3D controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) TSE with standard 2D TSE for knee MRI. Methods In this prospective study, 250 patients underwent 3 T knee MRI, including a multicontrast 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE (9:26 min) and a standard 2D TSE protocol (12:14 min). Thirty-three (13%) patients had previous anterior cruciate ligament and/or meniscus surgery. Two radiologists assessed MRIs for image quality and identified pathologies of menisci, ligaments, and cartilage by using a 4-point Likert scale according to the level of diagnostic confidence. Interchangeability of the protocols was tested under the same-reader scenario using a bootstrap percentile confidence interval. Interreader reliability and intermethod concordance were also evaluated. Results Despite higher image quality and diagnostic confidence for standard 2D TSE compared to 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE, the protocols were found interchangeable for diagnosing knee abnormalities, except for patellar (6.8% difference; 95% CI: 4.0, 9.6) and trochlear (3.6% difference; 95% CI: 0.8, 6.6) cartilage defects. The interreader reliability was substantial to almost perfect for 2D and 3D MRI (range kappa, 0.785-1 and kappa, 0.725-0.964, respectively). Intermethod concordance was almost perfect for all diagnoses (range kappa, 0.817-0.986). Conclusion Multicontrast 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE and standard 2D TSE protocols perform interchangeably for diagnosing knee abnormalities, except for patellofemoral cartilage defects. Despite the radiologist's preference for 2D TSE imaging, a pursuit towards time-saving 3D TSE knee MRI is justified for routine practice.