Publication:

Comparing 20 Hz Steady-State Somatosensory Neural Responses for Contact Vibrotactile and Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptic Stimulation

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0001-7716-4079
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0003-0479-6563
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-6077-6084
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0003-2056-1246
cris.virtualsource.departmente82e17dc-10d2-4914-afdb-c62dfbc10b2a
cris.virtualsource.department8125b51a-ae85-4cd4-a506-c9e9e1a75801
cris.virtualsource.department1fa60d26-7c18-408a-a326-082a79287417
cris.virtualsource.departmentcdac3f50-44be-4aaf-94f2-3bb46d68d069
cris.virtualsource.orcide82e17dc-10d2-4914-afdb-c62dfbc10b2a
cris.virtualsource.orcid8125b51a-ae85-4cd4-a506-c9e9e1a75801
cris.virtualsource.orcid1fa60d26-7c18-408a-a326-082a79287417
cris.virtualsource.orcidcdac3f50-44be-4aaf-94f2-3bb46d68d069
dc.contributor.authorCabooter, Quinn
dc.contributor.authorDe Bruyne, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorCasselman, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorDe Marez, Lieven
dc.contributor.authorBombeke, Klaas
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-22T09:49:48Z
dc.date.available2026-09-22T09:49:48Z
dc.date.createdwos2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractUltrasound mid-air haptics (UMAH) can create touch sensations without physical contact, but it remains unclear whether they evoke steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) that could serve as objective markers relevant to evaluating haptic perception in UMAH interfaces. This study tested whether 20 Hz UMAH delivered with a commercial device at maximum available intensity elicited SSSEPs comparable to those produced by vibrotactile stimulation (VTS). Electroencephalography was recorded from 26 participants during three stimulation conditions: full-intensity VTS, subjectively matched-intensity VTS, and full-intensity UMAH. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and power spectral density (PSD) at 20 Hz were analyzed over contralateral and ipsilateral somatosensory regions using linear mixed-effects models, with baseline estimates derived from no-stimulation intervals. Full-intensity VTS produced clear contralateral SSSEPs, and subjectively matched-intensity VTS yielded weaker but significant responses. In the present setup, UMAH did not yield a detectable 20 Hz SSSEP relative to baseline in either SNR or PSD. These findings support SSSEPs as sensitive markers of contact vibrotactile stimulation, but suggest that, with the present apparatus and analysis approach, they are not yet a robust objective measure for evaluating UMAH interface experience.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThe work of Jonas De Bruyne is supported by Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO fellowship; 11PEL24N).
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/electronics15143231
dc.identifier.issn2079-9292
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/60432
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.source.beginpage3231
dc.source.issue14
dc.source.journalELECTRONICS
dc.source.numberofpages18
dc.source.volume15
dc.subject.keywordsEVOKED-POTENTIALS
dc.title

Comparing 20 Hz Steady-State Somatosensory Neural Responses for Contact Vibrotactile and Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptic Stimulation

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-07-23
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-09-07
Files

Original bundle

Name:
electronics-15-03231-v2.pdf
Size:
5.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published
Publication available in collections: