Publication:

Double-slit experiment revisited

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0003-1726-6625
cris.virtualsource.departmentc273fa0f-d54b-4b99-8ab2-a883ff1f4f84
cris.virtualsource.orcidc273fa0f-d54b-4b99-8ab2-a883ff1f4f84
dc.contributor.authorDas, Siddhant
dc.contributor.authorDeckert, Dirk-Andre
dc.contributor.authorKellers, Leopold
dc.contributor.authorKrekels, Simon
dc.contributor.authorStruyve, Ward
dc.contributor.imecauthorKrekels, Simon
dc.contributor.orcidimecKrekels, Simon::0000-0003-1726-6625
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-06T04:50:32Z
dc.date.available2025-06-06T04:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe double-slit experiment is one of the quintessential quantum experiments. However, it tends to be overlooked that the build-up of the interference pattern involves single detection events with a random position and a random time of detection. Hence, a full theoretical account of this experiment requires the specification of the joint position and time distribution of detection at the screen, whose position marginal yields the famous interference pattern. The difficulty lies in what this distribution should be. While there are a variety of proposals for a quantum mechanical time observable , there is no consensus about the right choice. Here, we consider Bohmian mechanics, which allows for a natural and practical approach to this problem. We simulate this distribution in the case of an initial Gaussian wave packet passing through a double-slit potential. We also consider a more challenging setup in which one of the slits is closed during flight. To experimentally probe the quantum nature of the time distribution, a sufficient longitudinal spread of the initial wave packet is required, which has not been achieved so far. Without sufficient spread, the temporal aspect of the distribution can be treated classically. We illustrate this for the case of the double-slit experiment with helium atoms by Kurtsiefer et al. (1997), which reports the joint position and time distribution.
dc.description.wosFundingTextJ. Dziewior, C. Kurtsiefer, T. Maudlin, M. Mukherjee, S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghi, and H. Ulbricht are thanked for fruitful discussions, H. Weinfurter for suggesting the dynamic DSE, J. M. Wilkes for editorial inputs, and the referees for valuable comments. L.K. and D.-A.D. acknowledge funding from the Elite Network of Bavaria, Germany, through the Junior Research Group "Interaction Between Light and Matter". W.S. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, FWO) , Belgium, Grant No. G0C3322N. We dedicate this work to the memory of Detlef Duerr.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aop.2025.170054
dc.identifier.issn0003-4916
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/45771
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
dc.source.beginpage170054
dc.source.issueAugust
dc.source.journalANNALS OF PHYSICS
dc.source.numberofpages10
dc.source.volume479
dc.subject.keywordsQUANTUM-MECHANICAL APPROACH
dc.subject.keywordsARRIVAL-TIME
dc.subject.keywordsWIGNER FUNCTION
dc.subject.keywordsINTERFERENCE
dc.subject.keywordsTRAJECTORIES
dc.subject.keywordsDIFFRACTION
dc.subject.keywordsOBSERVABLES
dc.subject.keywordsENSEMBLE
dc.subject.keywordsATOM
dc.subject.keywordsFLUX
dc.title

Double-slit experiment revisited

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Publication available in collections: