Publication:

Comparing contact resistance of edge-, top-, and hybrid-contacted two-dimensional materials

Date

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-4157-1956
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-8879-5439
cris.virtualsource.departmentf9b525b6-66d0-4e40-8dd4-46fc733e347c
cris.virtualsource.departmente3dc9f57-7906-4941-8b7f-9365cb54a981
cris.virtualsource.orcidf9b525b6-66d0-4e40-8dd4-46fc733e347c
cris.virtualsource.orcide3dc9f57-7906-4941-8b7f-9365cb54a981
dc.contributor.authorDeylgat, Emeric
dc.contributor.authorChen, Edward
dc.contributor.authorSoree, Bart
dc.contributor.authorVandenberghe, William G.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-31T11:49:41Z
dc.date.available2026-08-31T11:49:41Z
dc.date.createdwos2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractTwo-dimensional semiconductors are promising channel materials for continuing transistor scaling and extending Moore’s law. However, as transistor density increases, the area available for contacts shrinks, making low-resistance contacts a critical challenge. Here, we theoretically investigate the performance and scalability of edge, top, and hybrid contacts to Mo⁢S2 monolayers. Using a quantum transport model that includes key mechanisms such as image-force barrier lowering as well as open vertical metal leads, we compare the contact resistance of these geometries while analyzing the impact of parameters such as doping concentration, surrounding dielectrics, metal work functions, van der Waals gap thickness, and contact length. We find that hybrid contacts generally yield the best performance, especially when scaled to contact lengths below 10 nm, achieving a contact resistance close to the quantum limit at doping concentrations above 1013 cm−2. The edge contact exhibits the poorest performance under most circumstances, as it suffers from higher Schottky barriers and lacks mechanisms to reduce them. While the top contact performs well, the hybrid contact shows significantly lower resistances at extreme scaling because it is less sensitive to long transfer lengths.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThis work has been supported by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under Grant No. N00014-23-1-2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/ddpx-1tt4
dc.identifier.issn2331-7019
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/60155
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherAMER PHYSICAL SOC
dc.source.beginpage044057
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.journalPHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
dc.source.numberofpages17
dc.source.volume25
dc.subject.keywordsTRANSPORT-PROPERTIES
dc.subject.keywordsEFFECTIVE-MASS
dc.subject.keywordsSINGLE-LAYER
dc.subject.keywordsMONOLAYER
dc.subject.keywordsTRANSITION
dc.subject.keywordsMOBILITY
dc.subject.keywordsSCHOTTKY
dc.subject.keywordsFINFET
dc.title

Comparing contact resistance of edge-, top-, and hybrid-contacted two-dimensional materials

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-07-14
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-07-14
Files
Publication available in collections: