Publication:

Designing and Personalising Hybrid Health Explanations for Lay Users

Date

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department18228008-6a29-4e04-85c0-4a38b149fdba
cris.virtualsource.departmentb3b498f5-e353-476d-8261-56bdfbbd8fbe
cris.virtualsource.orcid18228008-6a29-4e04-85c0-4a38b149fdba
cris.virtualsource.orcidb3b498f5-e353-476d-8261-56bdfbbd8fbe
dc.contributor.authorSzymanski, Maxwell
dc.contributor.authorKeyaerts, Stijn
dc.contributor.authorConati, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorDe Croon, Robin
dc.contributor.authorVanden Abeele Vero
dc.contributor.authorVerbert, Katrien
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-04T08:29:58Z
dc.date.available2026-06-04T08:29:58Z
dc.date.createdwos2026-02-28
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractRecommender systems are increasingly used in mobile health interventions, such as managing Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (CMP). While researchers have highlighted the importance of explaining health-related recommendations to lay users, with benefits such as increased trust and a higher tendency to follow up on these recommendations, how to design explanations for lay users in critical contexts such as health remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we develop a mobile health application to support users with CMP through coaching and personalised health recommendations delivered via a conversational rule-based recommender system. This article describes the three-phase iterative development of the RS, involving health experts and end users. In the first iteration, we conduct a preliminary validation study with N=282 participants to ensure the app’s validity and improve the initial set of health recommendations. Next, two user studies are conducted centred around designing effective and understandable explanations for these recommendations. First, we design six explanation modalities tailored towards lay users, and through a qualitative study (N=11), extract initial design guidelines for explaining health recommendations, finding a strong preference towards feature importance explanations and identifying issues with modalities that highlight negative emotions. Given these results, we explore whether extending feature importance explanations with textual information into a ‘hybrid’ explanation could benefit end users, and whether these benefits depend on a user’s personal characteristics (need for cognition and ease-of-satisfaction). Through a mixed-methods study with N=262 participants, we find that the hybrid modality significantly increased user trust, transparency, persuasiveness, usefulness and satisfaction compared to unimodal explanations. However, users with a higher need for cognition rate unimodal explanations more positively than hybrid ones.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThis work has been ethically approved by The Ethics Committee Research UZ/KU Leuven (EC Research) with application number S-65610 and funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, grant G067721N and G0A4923N) .
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3772071
dc.identifier.issn2160-6455
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/59547
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
dc.source.beginpage2
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.journalACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
dc.source.numberofpages37
dc.source.volume16
dc.subject.keywordsSYSTEM
dc.subject.keywordsPAIN
dc.title

Designing and Personalising Hybrid Health Explanations for Lay Users

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-04-07
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-04-07
Files
Publication available in collections: