Publication:

Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0001-7857-140X
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0003-0920-1709
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0001-6896-7275
cris.virtualsource.departmentda91ef83-4b39-43e3-87e1-573ae625d16a
cris.virtualsource.department48d3caed-8049-4a39-ae25-dd247b165b25
cris.virtualsource.department165c6e64-4175-4f16-853e-334c2212283a
cris.virtualsource.orcidda91ef83-4b39-43e3-87e1-573ae625d16a
cris.virtualsource.orcid48d3caed-8049-4a39-ae25-dd247b165b25
cris.virtualsource.orcid165c6e64-4175-4f16-853e-334c2212283a
dc.contributor.authorPrebeck, A.
dc.contributor.authorKeulemans, Grim
dc.contributor.authorStahl, U.
dc.contributor.authorJans, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorRottenberg, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorNtziachristos, V.
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-03T09:41:03Z
dc.date.available2026-06-03T09:41:03Z
dc.date.createdwos2025-11-23
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractOptical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThis work was supported in part by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant 862811 (RSENSE), in part by the European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme under Grant 101058111 (GLUMON), and in part by Imec's Strategic Innovation Program: Invest+. The associate editor coordinating the review of this article and approving it for publication was Prof. Jeong Bong Lee. (Corresponding author: V. Ntziachristos.)
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/jsen.2025.3594425
dc.identifier.issn1530-437X
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/59526
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
dc.source.beginpage34459
dc.source.endpage34467
dc.source.issue18
dc.source.journalIEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
dc.source.numberofpages9
dc.source.volume25
dc.subject.keywordsPHOTOACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY
dc.title

Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-04-07
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-04-07
Files

Original bundle

Name:
Comparison_of_Bulk_Piezoelectric_and_Opto-Mechanical_Micromachined_Detectors_for_Optoacoustic_and_Ultrasound_Sensing.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published
Publication available in collections: