Publication:
Is the constant current charge-to-breakdown method still a good tool to measure oxide reliability
Date
| dc.contributor.author | Nigam, Tanya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Degraeve, Robin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Groeseneken, Guido | |
| dc.contributor.author | Heyns, Marc | |
| dc.contributor.imecauthor | Degraeve, Robin | |
| dc.contributor.imecauthor | Groeseneken, Guido | |
| dc.contributor.imecauthor | Heyns, Marc | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-30T09:20:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-30T09:20:43Z | |
| dc.date.embargo | 9999-12-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/2054 | |
| dc.source.conference | 28th IEEE Semiconductor Interface Specialists Conference - SISC | |
| dc.source.conferencedate | 4/12/1997 | |
| dc.source.conferencelocation | Charleston, SC USA | |
| dc.title | Is the constant current charge-to-breakdown method still a good tool to measure oxide reliability | |
| dc.type | Meeting abstract | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| Files | Original bundle
| |
| Publication available in collections: |