Publication:

The Effects of Anxiety and Cognitive Load on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Date

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-2221-7281
cris.virtualsource.department7c42ebcb-3be6-489f-a832-fa6b9136e48c
cris.virtualsource.orcid7c42ebcb-3be6-489f-a832-fa6b9136e48c
dc.contributor.authorZoetewei, Demi
dc.contributor.authorGilat, Moran
dc.contributor.authorD'Cruz, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorCornelis, Jan 2
dc.contributor.authorNjiki, Jordan Bedime Songue
dc.contributor.authorHelmich, Rick C.
dc.contributor.authorGinis, Pieter
dc.contributor.authorNieuwboer, Alice
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-15T09:50:40Z
dc.date.available2026-10-15T09:50:40Z
dc.date.createdwos2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT It is currently unclear whether anxiety, cognitive load, or their combination modulates freezing of gait differently and whether people with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait (freezers) suffer from stronger threat responsiveness than nonfreezing groups. Therefore, we investigated 28 freezers, 19 nonfreezers, and 19 healthy age‐matched controls, who completed a freezing‐provoking protocol under different conditions. State anxiety was generated via a threat of shock or a threat of freezing paradigm. Cognitive load was imposed via a dual task. The primary outcome was the freezing ratio, derived from wearable sensors. Stress was monitored by self‐reported and physiological markers. Freezers had worse cognition and more severe motor symptoms than nonfreezers yet a similar trait anxiety and threat response compared with both nonfreezing groups. Anxiety and cognitive load tended to increase the freezing ratio across groups. When combined, anxiety and cognitive load showed no surplus effects. Compared with the threat of shock, the threat of freezing had less impact on the freezing ratio, and although it induced less perceived stress, it generated higher physiological stress responses. In conclusion, freezers showed overall comparable levels of trait anxiety and a similar threat response as nonfreezers and healthy controls. Anxiety and cognitive load each tended to increase the freezing ratio, but their combined effect seemed to plateau. The threat of freezing had a smaller effect than the threat of shock as the former may not have diverted the attention away from walking to the same degree as the latter, although this explanation remains speculative.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejn.70678
dc.identifier.eissn1460-9568
dc.identifier.issn0953-816X
dc.identifier.pmidMEDLINE:42725995
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/60565
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.source.beginpagee70678
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
dc.source.numberofpages13
dc.source.volume64
dc.subject.keywordsFEAR
dc.subject.keywordsMECHANISMS
dc.subject.keywordsTHREAT
dc.title

The Effects of Anxiety and Cognitive Load on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-09-12
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-09-19
Files
Publication available in collections: