Publication:

Automated CTA-based perforator mapping for DIEP flap planning in breast cancer reconstruction

Date

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0001-5714-3254
cris.virtualsource.departmente133c726-54e2-43d0-b225-6704605822fd
cris.virtualsource.orcide133c726-54e2-43d0-b225-6704605822fd
dc.contributor.authorKapila, Ayush K.
dc.contributor.authorMarcos, Diego Lamtenzan
dc.contributor.authorCeranka, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorBrussaard, Carola
dc.contributor.authorBoonen, Pieter Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLedegen, Laure
dc.contributor.authorVandemeulebroucke, Jef
dc.contributor.authorHamdi, Moustapha
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-02T09:44:05Z
dc.date.available2026-09-02T09:44:05Z
dc.date.createdwos2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAim: Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard for autologous reconstruction. Preoperative perforator mapping using computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to interobserver variability. Automated computer-aided detection (CAD) systems may help standardize and accelerate this process. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a proof-of-concept automated CAD pipeline for CTA-based perforator mapping in DIEP flap planning. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 504 CTA scans acquired for DIEP flap planning was analyzed. Fifty-five scans were manually annotated for perforator segmentation, and 100 scans were annotated for umbilicus landmark detection. A dual maximum intensity projection (MIP) depth-aware annotation workflow was introduced to standardize vessel labeling. The automated pipeline combined anatomical region of interest (ROI) localization with deep-learning-based vessel segmentation using a 3D Swin UNETR (Swin Transformer-based) model. Performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), centerline Dice, recall, and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Results: Depth-aware annotation reduced labeling time by approximately 60%-70%. ROI localization was successful in all scans (28 ± 5 s), and umbilicus localization achieved an error of approximately 2 mm. The Swin UNETR model achieved a median Dice score of 0.58, outperforming Attention U-Net. Continuity-aware training improved Dice to 0.60 and recall to 0.58, while multiclass segmentation improved performance in adipose tissue. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of an automated CAD pipeline integrating standardized annotation, anatomical ROI localization, and deep-learning-based vessel segmentation for DIEP flap planning. This represents an important step toward faster, more reproducible, and clinically scalable CTA-based perforator mapping.
dc.identifier.doi10.20517/ais.2026.01
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/60185
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherOAE PUBLISHING INC
dc.source.beginpage255
dc.source.endpage267
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.journalARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SURGERY
dc.source.numberofpages13
dc.source.volume6
dc.title

Automated CTA-based perforator mapping for DIEP flap planning in breast cancer reconstruction

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-07-14
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-07-14
Files

Original bundle

Name:
ais6001_down.pdf
Size:
2.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published
Publication available in collections: