Publication:

Enhancing automatic landmark localization in X-ray images using combined segmentation and regression models: application to lower limb alignment assessment

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0001-5714-3254
cris.virtualsource.departmente133c726-54e2-43d0-b225-6704605822fd
cris.virtualsource.orcide133c726-54e2-43d0-b225-6704605822fd
dc.contributor.authorZarghami, Ashkan
dc.contributor.authorAmador Sanchez, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorVan Overschelde, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorVandemeulebroucke, Jef
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-03T10:31:42Z
dc.date.available2026-09-03T10:31:42Z
dc.date.createdwos2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractManual landmark detection in lower limb medical imaging is time-consuming and error-prone. Recently, authors have proposed automatic landmark detection methods based on image segmentation, coordinate regression, or a combination of both to aid clinicians. While the latter approach shows promising results, detailed optimization of its design choices, including the integration strategy and hyperparameter tuning, remains unexplored. This study investigates the optimal approach to combining image segmentation and coordinate regression, focusing on selecting suitable network architectures and optimizing their configurations. We contrasted two methods for training the network: end-to-end training and cascading the subnetworks, and assessed the optimal architecture for each strategy. For landmark segmentation, we compared U-Net and Swin-UNETR models, and for coordinate regression, we assessed VGG-16, ResNet-50, and Swin-B. Performance was evaluated in detecting eight landmarks in each leg of a complete lower-limb X-ray and in examining their influence on the clinical task of measuring lower-limb malalignment. Swin-UNETR slightly outperformed U-Net, with a lower Euclidean distance error (1.74 mm [0.98 mm] versus 1.75 mm [1.06 mm]) and significantly fewer false positives (160 vs. 502). For coordinate regression, VGG-16 in the end-to-end configuration achieved the highest accuracy (2.44 mm [2.12 mm]) and proved optimal for lower limb alignment assessment, with 97.88% of estimations falling within of the hip–knee–ankle angle ground truth. Combining Swin-UNETR with VGG-16 within an end-to-end framework yields the most accurate and robust performance for automated lower-limb landmark detection and alignment assessment.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThe presented job was funded by the Innoviris grant [BHF / 2020-RDIR-6a] of the Brussels-Capital Region, as part of the project ANTICIPATE on Augmented Intelligence in Orthopaedics Treatments.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-026-49750-2
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.pmidMEDLINE:42020697
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/60196
dc.language.isoeng
dc.provenance.editstepusergreet.vanhoof@imec.be
dc.publisherNATURE PORTFOLIO
dc.source.beginpage18635
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.journalSCIENTIFIC REPORTS
dc.source.numberofpages12
dc.source.volume16
dc.subject.keywordsCOMPONENT
dc.title

Enhancing automatic landmark localization in X-ray images using combined segmentation and regression models: application to lower limb alignment assessment

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
imec.internal.crawledAt2026-07-14
imec.internal.sourcecrawler
imec.internal.wosCreatedAt2026-07-14
Files

Original bundle

Name:
s41598-026-49750-2.pdf
Size:
2.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published
Publication available in collections: