Publication:

Development of a biocompatible, low-cost reinforcement of methacrylated alginate hydrogels using synthetic crosslinking agents

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0003-4183-0150
cris.virtualsource.department33fcfb9f-328d-4c02-835f-544993a14681
cris.virtualsource.orcid33fcfb9f-328d-4c02-835f-544993a14681
dc.contributor.authorCisneros, Carolina Gutierrez
dc.contributor.authorAgten, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorDerveaux, Elien
dc.contributor.authorAdriaensens, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBloemen, Veerle
dc.contributor.authorMignon, Arn
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T04:49:27Z
dc.date.available2025-06-04T04:49:27Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe skin is a vital organ that protects the human body, making it highly susceptible to injury. When wounds fail to heal properly, they can become chronic and prone to infection. Hydrogel-based wound dressings, made from natural and synthetic polymers, play a crucial role in wound management by enhancing the wound environment, providing a protective interface over the wound, retaining moisture, and facilitating ease of removal which supports the formation of new tissue. Among these, methacrylated alginate hydrogels show promising biological potential but require improvement in mechanical strength to meet clinical demands due to their large moisture uptake capacity. In this study, methacrylated alginate hydrogels were reinforced with four low-cost (meth)acrylic crosslinkers: ethylene glycol diacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate, to improve mechanical properties without compromising biological efficacy. The best formulation, using the first one, demonstrated a swelling capacity of 40 g of water per g of hydrogel, significantly outperforming commercial products like Kaltostat (25 g/g) and AquacelAg (18 g/g). Its mechanical strength (∼0.06 MPa) was comparable to DuoDERM-ET (0.07 MPa) and Mepilex (∼0.05 MPa). The hydrogel also demonstrated excellent in vitro biocompatibility, positioning it as a simple, cost-effective alternative to reinforce methacrylated hydrogels so they eventually become possibly useful as wound dressings, mechanically and physically strongly competing with commercial dressings, while still offering room for future bioactive development to enhance wound healing.
dc.description.wosFundingTextFinancial support from Hasselt University and the Research Foun-dation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen) via the Hercules project (AUHL/15/2-GOH3816N) is gratefully acknowledged.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2025.106330
dc.identifier.issn1381-5148
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/45755
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.source.beginpage106330
dc.source.issueSeptember
dc.source.journalREACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
dc.source.numberofpages12
dc.source.volume214
dc.subject.keywordsCOPOLYMERS
dc.title

Development of a biocompatible, low-cost reinforcement of methacrylated alginate hydrogels using synthetic crosslinking agents

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Publication available in collections: