Publication:

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study

 
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-6911-7632
cris.virtualsource.department98708267-9622-463b-8648-b614f1907851
cris.virtualsource.orcid98708267-9622-463b-8648-b614f1907851
dc.contributor.authorDerickx, Katleen
dc.contributor.authorvan Roozendaal, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorPonnet, Koen
dc.contributor.authorDeforche, Benedicte
dc.contributor.authorThienpondt, Annelies
dc.contributor.authorVan Hal, Guido
dc.contributor.imecauthorPonnet, Koen
dc.contributor.orcidimecPonnet, Koen::0000-0002-6911-7632
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-13T04:52:40Z
dc.date.available2025-06-13T04:52:40Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractBackground Students are increasingly engaging in the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) to enhance their study performance. However, little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce NMUPS. This study assessed the effect of a social norms approach (SNA) intervention on NMUPS and the perception of NMUPS for study performance among Flemish students. Additionally, a process evaluation of the intervention was performed. Methods A social media campaign, containing social norm messages based on data from ‘Head in the Clouds?’ (HITC) survey edition 2021, ran from December 2022 to April 2023 at the University of Antwerp. Data from the HITC survey was also used as baseline measurement (Antwerp: n = 2,963, Ghent: n = 8,598). Afterward, a post-intervention survey was conducted among the students of the University of Antwerp (n = 1,827) and Ghent University (n = 3,333), the latter serving as the control group. A quantitative process evaluation among the intervention group was conducted according to the guidance of the Medical Research Council for process evaluation of complex interventions. Results A difference-in-difference approach showed that students of the intervention group at endline estimated NMUPS for study performance among peers significantly lower (P < .0001; Est. = -3.792; SE = 0.805)—and thus closer to the real social norm. There was no significant influence (P = 0.421; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.87 to -1.39) of the intervention on NMUPS for study performance. The process analysis showed that 18.7% of the intervention group had seen the campaign. Most of them found the campaign credible (83.6%) and clear (website: 90.8%; videos 94.7%; images: 92.4%). The overall satisfaction was 6.38 (SD 1.68) out of 10. Very few students (3.1%) had seen the campaign via TikTok, compared to Facebook (64.0%) and Instagram (53.3%), although 35.7% of the total budget had been spent on TikTok. Conclusions The results of this study confirm that an SNA intervention could reduce the misperceptions of NMUPS among students. However, the hypothesis that the behavior of NMUPS for study performance would be reduced subsequently could not be demonstrated. Follow-up research is needed to investigate long-term effects. The implementation of the intervention might be improved by making more optimal use of the campaign budget.
dc.description.wosFundingTextThe authors would like to thank Margot Bloemen from the communication department of the University of Antwerp for the support in the development and implementation of the campaign. We would also like to thank the Flemish expertise center on alcohol and other drugs for coordinating the Head in the Clouds survey of Flemish students, which takes place every four years, and for facilitating the data of the 2021 Head in the Clouds study. Finally, we thank all students who completed the Head in the Clouds questionnaire in 2021 and/or the post-intervention survey in 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13690-025-01603-6
dc.identifier.issn0778-7367
dc.identifier.pmidMEDLINE:40481595
dc.identifier.urihttps://imec-publications.be/handle/20.500.12860/45799
dc.publisherBMC
dc.source.beginpage1
dc.source.endpage16
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.journalARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.source.numberofpages16
dc.source.volume83
dc.subject.keywordsPERCEIVED PEER USE
dc.subject.keywordsACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE
dc.subject.keywordsALCOHOL-USE
dc.subject.keywordsATTITUDES
dc.subject.keywordsVALIDITY
dc.title

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study

dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files

Original bundle

Name:
s13690-025-01603-6.pdf
Size:
2.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published
Publication available in collections: